When it comes to protecting American values, the contrast between the Harris/Walz ticket and Trump/Vance couldn’t be clearer. The policies championed by Harris and Walz represent a sharp departure from the ideals that have long defined the nation. From issues like price controls and immigration amnesty to unrestricted abortions and gun control, the Harris/Walz platform embodies a significant shift toward socialist and collectivist policies. By comparison, Donald Trump and JD Vance stand firmly on the side of traditional American values—those that have upheld individual liberty, free enterprise, and the sovereignty of the American people.
Let’s examine how the values represented by the Harris/Walz campaign compare to the principles defended by Trump and Vance.
1. Economic Freedom vs. Price Controls
- Harris/Walz: One of the hallmarks of socialism and communism is state intervention in the economy, often through mechanisms like price controls. These measures, while intended to combat inflation and reduce costs for consumers, often lead to market distortions, shortages, and reduced incentives for innovation. Price controls can create a more centralized economy, moving away from the free-market principles that have made the U.S. economy the largest in the world.
- Trump/Vance: On the other hand, Trump and Vance are staunch defenders of free-market capitalism, emphasizing deregulation and tax cuts to stimulate economic growth and empower individuals and businesses to thrive. By reducing government interference, they uphold a system that rewards entrepreneurship, innovation, and hard work—the foundations of American prosperity.
2. Illegal Immigration and Amnesty
- Harris/Walz: The Harris/Walz platform includes a more lenient approach to immigration, including pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and sanctuary policies that limit local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Their policies reflect a more globalist perspective that often undermines the enforcement of American immigration laws.
- Trump/Vance: In stark contrast, Trump’s America First agenda prioritizes border security and the enforcement of immigration laws. Trump worked to build the border wall, implemented stricter immigration policies, and opposed amnesty for illegal immigrants. These policies are based on the idea that the sovereignty of the nation must be protected, and legal immigration must be upheld to preserve the rule of law(The American Presidency Project).
3. Abortion and the Sanctity of Life
- Harris/Walz: The Harris/Walz campaign supports policies for unrestricted access to abortion, with Harris having been vocal about her opposition to any federal or state limitations on abortion rights. They advocate for a woman’s right to choose, including late-term abortions, which many Americans find deeply troubling from a moral and ethical standpoint.
- Trump/Vance: Trump’s presidency saw the appointment of three conservative Supreme Court justices who ultimately played a role in the Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump and Vance support pro-life policies that emphasize the protection of unborn children and advocate for reasonable restrictions on abortion, aligning with the values of millions of Americans who believe in the sanctity of life(National Review).
4. Gender Ideology and Minors
- Harris/Walz: A key issue in the Harris/Walz platform is their support for transgender rights, including access to gender reassignment surgeries for minors. They advocate for policies that allow minors to undergo life-altering medical procedures, such as hormone treatments and surgeries, without significant parental oversight in some cases. This stance reflects a broader shift toward state intervention in personal and family matters.
- Trump/Vance: Trump and Vance oppose gender reassignment surgeries for minors, emphasizing parental rights and the protection of children from irreversible medical procedures until they are adults capable of making informed decisions. This position aligns with traditional American values that prioritize family autonomy and the safeguarding of children’s well-being(National Review).
5. Healthcare: Single-Payer vs. Free-Market Solutions
- Harris/Walz: Harris and Walz support expanded government control over healthcare, with proposals that move toward single-payer healthcare systems or significant expansions of public healthcare programs. While their approach is rooted in the desire for universal coverage, single-payer systems often result in longer wait times, reduced quality of care, and higher taxes to fund the program.
- Trump/Vance: Trump and Vance advocate for free-market solutions to healthcare, focusing on lowering costs through competition, reducing government regulation, and expanding access to private health insurance. This approach maintains individual choice in healthcare while seeking to improve affordability and quality without the heavy hand of government intervention(National Review).
6. Second Amendment and Gun Rights
- Harris/Walz: Gun control is a central part of the Harris/Walz agenda. Both candidates have expressed support for stricter gun control measures, including bans on mulitple types of firearms, increased background checks, and limitations on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. They see gun control as a means of reducing gun violence, even though these policies only disarm law-abiding citizens.
- Trump/Vance: Trump and Vance are staunch defenders of the Second Amendment, viewing the right to bear arms as fundamental to American liberty and self-defense. They argue that responsible gun ownership is a cornerstone of individual freedom and a necessary check on tyranny, and they oppose efforts to impose bans or excessive restrictions on firearms(National Review).
Conclusion
The divide between the Harris/Walz and Trump/Vance campaigns represents a clash of visions for America’s future. Harris and Walz advocate for government control and collectivist ideals, echoing principles of socialism and communism that fundamentally challenge the American ethos of freedom, personal responsibility, and individual rights.
In contrast, Trump and Vance stand firmly on the side of traditional American values—protecting economic freedom, national sovereignty, the sanctity of life, family autonomy, and constitutional rights. The choice is clear: to preserve the values that have made America strong, the country needs leadership that will uphold these principles and push back against the creeping influence of collectivism.